Is It Feasible To Retrofit An Existing Electric- Or Oil-Heated Building With A Geoexchange System?

Sometimes yes, sometimes no. There are several considerations when deciding if a geothermal system would be cost effective in an existing building.

exchangenergy has written an in-depth article on our blog about it. Click here to read more about what to consider when deciding on a geothermal retrofit.

  • Contact us for a quote!

Comments

One Response to “Is It Feasible To Retrofit An Existing Electric- Or Oil-Heated Building With A Geoexchange System?”
  1. MIke Latin says:

    Howdy,
    We live in Hamilton and installed a 4 tonne system
    about five years ago. Quiet and efficient (we can
    cool the house 15 degrees celcius in an hour), we
    do not regret anything.
    It replaced an oil burning furnace that was from
    the mid-1980′s and had a 900L tank that we filled
    4 times per year. The last fill was $1.10/litre –
    the $3600+ per year for oil, the CO2 producing
    fossil fuel, the premium to our insurance due to
    having this flammable/costly leak clean up fuel
    in our home is not missed.
    But we live in Ontario. The Liberal Gov’mnt here
    are pushing clean energy. Which is great… but
    they are increasing electricity bills (46% over
    five years) to try and force people to conserve
    energy and reduce GHG’s.
    Geotheraml systems only use electricity to power
    the pupms and convert the heat. Our consumption
    went from about 8700 KWHr with oil heat to 14
    294KWhr with the geothermal/ground source heat
    system. We saved over $2500 that year alone. But
    and almost 50% increase really bites into the
    payback period we initially projected at twelve
    years. It is ironic that they will have replaced
    the dirty coal plants with wind power and a big
    expansion of hydroelctricity capacity at Niagara
    Falls giving us a zero GHG footprint with the
    geothermal system yet it will take me years
    longer (46%+ more) to try an recoup the extra
    money back that we invested into this system.

    In true government[limited perspective] form,
    their move to force conservation of electricity
    to decrease GHG production means those burning
    heating oil and Natural Gas will likely have a
    much lower operating cost than our clean, zero
    emission system.

    Thougths about this?

    Mike

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!